(I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

by **Deathtoll32** on Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:43 am

Haha, I knew you'd be tempted to look.

Anyone else pumped to finally hear the new Guns N' Roses album?

I would hope that it's amazing. After 17 years, you would definitely think so at least.
Just think: It's like going 17 years without a pay-day Razz

That would suck. I've heard only one song (Chinese Democracy). Sounds good, but the singer just doesn't compare to the original.

I don't really know what you British people listen to, but it sounds almost like Nickelback. They kinda lost the feel, but I'm still excited to see what they've came up with

by patti11 on Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:20 am

nickleback=hinder=piece of crap

by MidniteXpress on Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:44 am

Nickleback? sorry to dissapoint but we have taste...well some of us do.
as for the new guns album, from what i've heard so far it's a bit of a let down. not their best work. but the same can be said for the other revival albums out by metallica and acdc etc

now excuse me while i put on some classic sabbath and pretend bon jovi never existed

by **rastari** on Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:37 pm

not too keen on the new gun's n roses album they should of just left it it's a bit like the sex pistols doing another tour what's the point?

by Alan Hammond on Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:07 am

rastari wrote:not too keen on the new gun's n roses album they should of just left it it's a bit like the sex pistols doing another tour what's the point?

Not to keen is too kind, this album would have been better suited to remaining a myth. The vocals on the majority of the tracks are horrible, and it seems they just couldnt decide on one sort of music style so they incorporated as many as possible

by **rastari** on Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:12 am

yeah although it didn't have an experimental feel to it more confused

by Alan Hammond on Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:56 pm

rastari wrote:yeah although it didn't have an experimental feel to it more confused

Definetly, like i said, the Myth around the album was more exciting then the album

by **Bob Boblo** on Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:38 am

Chinese Deomcracy? Maybe they should have called it eUK democracy? Laughing

Couldn't resist......

by bestie101 on Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:31 pm

Their new albums bad, they should have quit while they were ahead Razz

by **malta_1990** on Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:38 pm

I agree. Its crap.

by **Taytaz** on Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:40 pm

We'd been waiting foe Chinese Democracy almost as long as...well...real Chinese Democracy

by **malta_1990** on Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:42 pm

Taytaz wrote:We'd been waiting foe Chinese Democracy almost as long as...well...real Chinese Democracy

Let's hope the real Chinese Democracy is better than the album.

by **Taytaz** on Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:44 pm

Yeah, i'd hAte their first elected leader to have horrible vocals!

by **malta_1990** on Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:49 pm

The album has been banned in China. I wonder whether it was because of the name or because of the content.

by **Taytaz** on Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:52 pm

Or because the leader was embarassed he was worse than the singer

(I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

(I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)

Re: (I won't tell you in the Title what this is about)